PolitySocial_Issues
News 6 of 23

ART & Surrogacy Acts (2022): Age Limits (21-55), 33 HC Petitions Challenge 'Parent' Definition, SC to Rule on Validity

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
14 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:202233 petitionsAge 21-50 (Women ART)Age 21-55 (Men ART)Age 23-50 (Women Surrogacy)Age 26-55 (Men Surrogacy)
Bodies:Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtCalcutta High CourtBombay High CourtMinistry of Health
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Core: The ART (Regulation) Act, 2021 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, operational since 2022, face multiple High Court challenges (33+ petitions) questioning their strict eligibility criteria for parenthood.

2.Strategic Fact: Key legal issues include age limits (21-50 women, 21-55 men for ART; 23-50 women, 26-55 men for surrogacy), rights of divorced/OCI individuals, posthumous use of gametes, and fate of cryopreserved embryos.

3.Examiner's Angle: Focus is on the intersection of statutory law, constitutional rights (reproductive autonomy, equality), personal laws, and evolving family structures, testing understanding of judicial interpretation and legislative gaps.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The 2022 Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Acts are facing legal challenges over their restrictive definitions of parenthood and eligibility criteria. At least 33 petitions across High Courts question age limits, rights of single/divorced persons, OCI status, and embryo disposition. The Supreme Court is set to adjudicate the constitutional validity, making this a crucial contemporary issue for rights and bioethics.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Year of Enforcement2022
Total HC Petitions (Past Year)At least 33
ART Act Age Limit (Women)21-50 years
Surrogacy Act Age Limit (Men)26-55 years
SC Ruling on Age Bar (Oct 2025)Not retrospective for processes started pre-2022

1-Minute Revision

  • Year of Enforcement: 2022
  • Total HC Petitions (Past Year): At least 33
  • Target this Data: Age limits under ART Act (Women: 21-50, Men: 21-55) and Surrogacy Act (Women: 23-50, Men: 26-55).
  • Target this Nodal Body: National Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Board.
  • Target this Legal Point: Section 22 of the ART Act mandates written informed consent from all parties, allowing unilateral withdrawal.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

1Static LinkageEasy

Which statutory body is established under the ART and Surrogacy Acts to advise and oversee their implementation?

2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021:

1. It permits unilateral withdrawal of consent for procedures involving cryopreserved embryos.

2. It sets an age limit of 21-50 years for women seeking ART services.

3. It allows Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholders who are single and divorced to access surrogacy services.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

3Data-centricMedium

According to the article, how many petitions challenging the ART and Surrogacy Acts have High Courts across India heard in the past year alone?

4Application/ImpactMedium

What is a primary legal contention raised in petitions against the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, as illustrated by the case of Bhoomi Patel?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Prioritizes Reproductive Autonomy Under Article 21, Allows MTP Beyond 24 Weeks for Minor Rape Survivors

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed reproductive autonomy as a fundamental right under Article 21, allowing a minor rape survivor to terminate a 30-week pregnancy. This highlights the legal and ethical complexities surrounding late-term abortions under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, pitting a woman's rights against fetal viability.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds ₹8.09 Lakh Back Wages for MSRTC Worker, Criticizes 'Unequal Bargaining Power' Doctrine

The Supreme Court set aside a Bombay High Court order, restoring an Industrial Court directive for the MSRTC to pay ₹8.09 lakh in back wages to a daily wager. The judgment is a critical precedent on 'unequal bargaining power,' preventing employers from imposing unfair conditions on employees during regularisation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Dismisses AIIMS Review, Upholds Minor's Right to MTP Under Article 21, Citing Reproductive Autonomy

The Supreme Court dismissed AIIMS's review petition, upholding its order to medically terminate a minor's 7-month pregnancy. The landmark ruling reinforces reproductive autonomy and privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution, establishing that a woman's choice outweighs fetal viability in cases of unwanted pregnancy.

Polity Current Affairs

FAIMA Petitions SC: Replace NTA, Form High-Powered Committee for NEET-UG 2026 Re-Exam After Paper Leak Affects 22.7 Lakh Students

The Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) has filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding fundamental reforms to the NEET-UG exam system following a major paper leak in 2026. The petition seeks to replace the National Testing Agency (NTA) and calls for the re-conducted exam to be supervised by a judicially appointed committee. This is a critical case study for aspirants on institutional accountability and governance failures in public examinations.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Affirms Reproductive Autonomy as Fundamental Right, Urges Revisit of MTP Act 1971 to Remove Gestational Limits for Minor Rape Survivors

The Supreme Court has firmly placed a woman's reproductive autonomy and bodily integrity at the centre of the abortion rights debate, declaring it a fundamental right under Article 21. It has urged Parliament to revise the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, especially to remove gestational limits for minor rape survivors, moving from a permission-based to a rights-based framework.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Expands 'Acid Attack Victim' Definition Under RPwD Act 2016 to Include Forcible Acid Ingestion

The Supreme Court has expanded the legal definition of 'acid attack victims' under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 to include survivors of forcible acid ingestion. This crucial judicial interpretation, which applies retrospectively from 2016, closes a legal gap and enables these victims to access disability benefits and compensation previously reserved only for victims of acid-throwing.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs High-Powered Committee to Enforce Disability Rights in Prisons, Mandates Compliance Affidavits Within 6 Weeks

The Supreme Court has shifted from issuing guidelines to ensuring implementation of rights for prisoners with disabilities. It has entrusted a High-Powered Committee to oversee systemic reforms, demanding compliance affidavits from all states within six weeks to address gaps in accessibility, healthcare, and dignity under Articles 14 and 21.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Upholds AWBI SOP on Stray Dogs; Links Right to Free Movement to Article 21 Dignity

The Supreme Court dismissed pleas challenging the AWBI's SOP for stray dog management, upholding that the right to live with dignity under Article 21 includes freedom from fear of dog bites in public spaces. It directed states to urgently implement the Animal Birth Control Rules 2023 framework, citing alarming data on dog bite incidents nationwide.